By outlining in some detail a piece of structural contingency Essay

By outlining in some detail a piece of structural happening research, evaluate the contributions of this general hail to s - Essay ExampleThe root word will discuss the theory in detail and how it affects the performance of an organisation. The report will also discuss the change on the organisation due to the various misadventure variables. The contingency cycle, which changes an organisation from fit to misfit, and then again brings it back to fit though organisation structuring, is explained with examples. Discussion coin bank the late 1950s, school of classical management dominated the organisational expression. According to this school of thought, one single organisational scheme was trenchant for all kinds of organisational structure. It was categorised by high degree of planning and ending making. There was a strict hierarchy in this structure and the job responsibilities were well detailed to the lower level round in advance, by the senior management. From 1930 onwa rds, this school of thought was challenged extensively by the new school of thought, cognize as school of human relations. According to this approach, individual employees possessed social and psychological needs. Bottom-up approach was followed here and the lower level departments were increasingly motivated to participate in the decision making processes of the organisation. some researchers and theorists such(prenominal) as J. W. Lorsch and P.R. Lawrence, (1978) suggested that firms which operated in slight stable environments were found to be operating more effectively. little formalization of the organisation leads to more reliance on mutual agreement between the various departments of the organisation. On the other hand, in reference of companies operating in a certain and more stable environment, effective functioning was recognised only when the firm was more formalized, decision making was centralised and there was less reliance on the mutual agreement between differen t departments. There be many theories of contingency approached. But the most accepted and popular ones are those which are related to leadership, management or organisational structure (Tuai, 2011). According to the overall approach of this, whatever happens in a firm depends upon particular circumstances or factors. In general, when whole or parts of an organisation fits together, they are referred to as organisational structure. More specifically, structures include factors such as complexity, formalization and centralisation (Martinez-Leon and Martinez-Garcia, 2011). The dimensions of complexity can be categorised as, spatial, vertical and horizontal. In case of formalisation, the options for individuals are little. There is a higher vertical note where a managers run short is define by other senior manager and the senior managers work is defined by other managers. This results in division of labour and decrease in discretion. It is different than spatial differentiation bec ause in spatial differentiation, there are organisation wide procedures that limit the discretion. Examples of higher formalisation are bank call centres, supermarkets. Examples for lower formalisation include lawyers, doctors, academics and that formalisation which are associated with skill. Centralisation refers to the extent of decision making, authority and king. Centralisation is inversely correlated with complexity because increase in complexity reduces the central power by distributing these powers through hierarchies and functions. Centralization is weakly correlated to